| Pedro Guevara Memorial National High School Annex 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| • AERS 282 Social Research Design • All About the Main Campus • Annex History • From the Chair • From the Principal • Galing • ICT Infusion at PLMun • Knowledge Search • Line of Intelligent Students • Mapehcat_IV_VGM • Modules • News n Opinions • Pagpapahalaga II • Quizzes and Exercises for Fun • Reflections • Scholarships • SmokeyMOuntain • Test Creation • Test Results • ValuesIV • What the OIC Says • Whats New | |||||||||||||||||||||
| AERS 282 Social Research Design | Feedback →![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dear fellow AERS 282 students, Please don’t ask me any question during my report. Instead, let us have a collaborative effort to come up with a correct consensus. Thank you and God bless! Laury Arca’05-‘06 Preliminary Questions: 1. How will you measure the degree to which lovers gaze into one another’s eyes during conversations? 2. In jeepneys, how will you prove that a boy and a girl are sweethearts? THE LECTURE q Experiments q Observation q Ethnomethodology q Document Study q Simulations and Games This report however focuses just on observation. OBSERVATIONAL METHOD DEFINED Observational method (Bailey, 1987) q Is the primary technique for collecting data on nonverbal behavior; q Mostly involves sight or visual data collection but it also includes data collection via the other senses, such as hearing, touch, or smell; q Is often conducted as preliminary to survey, and may also be conducted jointly with document study or experimentation; q Occurs when one wants to study in detail the behavior that occurs in some particular setting or institution. Sample Constructs Where Observation is Required Over Other Techniques by Hoyle, et al (2002). q Hunger q Anxiety q Sadness An Example of Observational Study Kerr (1979) as cited by Bailey (1987), was interested in the use of space by the staff members within a hospital. One of her hypotheses was that for a given level of status hospital staff members would maintain greater distance during interaction with other staff members of lower status than with staff of higher status. Although everyone maintains interpersonal distance during conversation, for example, many persons do so almost subconsciously and thus are generally unaware of the exact distances they maintain or of changes in the distance maintained. Thus, it is very doubtful that that the hypotheses could be adequately tested through a survey. Kerr chose the observational method and studied the day-to-day interaction of 62 subjects over a four-month period. Kerr found some support for his hypothesis. For example, residents (physicians) maintained greater distance in interaction with nurses and ward secretaries than they did with other residents or with senior physicians. TYPES OF OBSERVATION BAILEY (1987)
GLOSSARY A. Extraneous VariablesFor example, let’s say that an educational psychologist has developed a new learning strategy and is interested in examining the effectiveness of this strategy. The experimenter randomly assigns students to two groups. All of the students study text materials on a biology topic for thirty minutes. One group uses the new strategy and the other uses a strategy of their choice. Then all students complete a test over the materials. One obvious confounding variable in this case would be pre-knowledge of the biology topic that was studied. This variable will most likely influence student scores, regardless of which strategy they use. Because of this extraneous variable (and surely others) there will be some spread within each of the groups. It would be better, of course, if all students came in with the exact same pre-knowledge. However, the experimenter has taken an important step to greatly increase the chances that, at least, the extraneous variable will add error variance equivalently between the two groups. That is, the experimenter randomly assigned students to the two groups. B. Confounding Variables One of the most common types of confounding occurs when an experimenter does not or can not randomly assign participants to groups, and some type of individual difference (e.g., ability, extroversion, shyness, height, weight) acts as a confounding variable. For example, any experiment that involves a comparison of men and women is inherently plagued with confounding variables, the most commonly cited of which is that the social environment for males and females is very different. This does not mean that there is no meaning or value in gender comparison studies, or other studies in which random C. Actor-observer Bias”
MAJOR STEPS IN OBSERVATION
References: BAILEY, KENNETH D. “Methods of Social Research.” Third Edition. Copyright 1987 by the Free Press; WU, SHELLEY, Ph.D. Actor Observer Bias. http://www.google.com. Retrieved, August 10, 2005. | |||||||||||||||||||||